NasimJam
heycar heycar · B2C · 2022–2023

Cutting heycar's search from five fields to three

High-intent shoppers were abandoning heycar's homepage search before they ever saw a listing. I cut it from five fields to three and shipped it across four European markets, as part of a redesign that lifted regional customer engagement by 18%. Three years later, it's still the live search.

Role
Product Designer
Scope
Research · analytics · prototyping · design system
My ownership
Research · analytics · prototyping · component definition
Team
3 product designers (incl. me) · product + engineering
Markets
DE · UK · FR · NL
Tools
Figma · Miro · Maze
Lifespan
Live 3 years
heycar case study

The problem

The homepage asked too much, too early. Five fields stood between a visitor and their first look at a car, and the funnel data showed high-intent shoppers arriving and leaving without ever starting a search. They weren't bouncing off the inventory. They never got that far.

Before: make, model, city, radius, and a total-price vs monthly toggle.
Before: make, model, city, radius, and a total-price vs monthly toggle.

What the research said

Most shoppers didn't arrive knowing make and model. They came with a budget and a rough idea, and a form built around make and model was forcing a decision they hadn't made yet.User interviews across markets
The four markets had drifted apart. Each country ran its own variation of the search, so every improvement had to be designed, built, and maintained four times over.Funnel analysis

The bet I made early

Inside the company, more filters up front meant more value, and every field on that homepage was somebody's priority. I bet the other way: the homepage's job is to make starting cheap, and the depth belongs on the results page, where you can actually see what your choices do to the results.

To keep that argument from turning into a matter of taste, I got the team behind one metric: search-initiation rate. Not engagement, not time on page. Do more people start a search, yes or no. Having a single testable claim is what carried the design through every stakeholder review that followed.

Design explorations for the simplified search.

The design

The new search asks for three things a shopper already knows when they show up. Everything else moved to the results page as progressive filtering, where narrowing down feels like control instead of homework.

Together with two other designers, I defined the tokens, interaction states, and accessibility behavior for the new components, built so all four markets could share one implementation. The per-country variants were retired.

After: make, model, zip code.
After: make, model, zip code.

Before and after: the user's journey

A high-intent shopper's path to their next car, before and after this work.

Land on the homepage

Before

Arrive with clear intent, greeted by five inputs: make, model, city, radius, and a price toggle.

"I just want to see the cars." The tool meant to help is the first obstacle.

After

Three fields: make, model, zip code. One unambiguous CTA.

"This will take ten seconds."

Start a search

Before

Five decisions before seeing a single car. Five chances to second-guess and click away.

Hesitation. Many high-intent visitors left without doing anything, in every market.

After

Three inputs they already know the answers to.

Momentum. Starting a search costs almost nothing.

See results

Before

Many never got here. Those who did had set filters blind, so results reflected guesses.

Frustration or absence. The funnel dropped people before the product could show its value.

After

Results appear fast, and now there's something concrete to react to.

Progress. Real cars, real prices, something to refine.

Refine

Before

Refinement happened up front, without context. Users who set radius or price on the homepage changed them again on the results page anyway.

Redundant. Work done twice, once blind and once informed.

After

Radius, price model, and advanced filters live on the results page, where users have context to use them.

Natural. Narrowing down, not filling out a form.

Return later

Before

Four markets, fragmented per-country implementations.

Unfamiliar. The product felt different depending on where you were.

After

One shared search pattern across all four markets, built from design system components.

Consistent. Still live three years later.

What actually changed

Nothing was removed, everything was sequenced. The questions users couldn't answer on the homepage moved to the results page, where they could. The entry point stopped taxing intent and started converting it.

Outcomes

Contributed to an 18% increase in regional customer engagement across the redesigned markets.
One unified search pattern replaced four separate per-country implementations.
The search and filter components I co-defined were adopted by every product team and fed into the design-system work that cut design debt by 25%.
Still live across all four markets three years later, structurally unchanged, having outlasted multiple product cycles.
Reflection
The most contested pixels are the ones everyone can see. What won the argument wasn't a better mockup, it was evidence plus one shared metric that everyone agreed to be judged by. And asking users for less takes more discipline than it sounds.

More work

Let's build something ✷

Have a project in mind? I'd love to hear and connect with you. Let's get in touch and discuss how we can bring your ideas to life. Email me at nr9473@gmail.com

← Back to the board